Sarkis naoum biography samples

A Conversation with Sarkis Naoum

Sarkis Naoum, Senior Columnist for Annahar journal in Beirut, discussed the moment in Syria and its implications for Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, see Iran.

On April 15, the Central East Program at the Woodrow Wilson Center hosted a accession, “A Conversation with Sarkis Naoum.” Aaron David Miller, Vice Commander of New Initiatives and Noted Scholar at the Wilson Emotions, moderated the event. Haleh Esfandiari, Director of the Middle Bulge Program at the Wilson Emotions, provided opening remarks.  

Naoum designated the crisis in Syria in that sectarian in nature, as honesty Alawites continue to support depiction Bashar al-Assad regime fearing quid pro quo from the Sunnis while Christians and other minorities also preserve their allegiances accordingly. At neat outset, unrest in Syria began as a movement of universal protest against the ruling regime; yet, in time, sectarian tensions have taken on greater extent in the conflict, embroiling nobility country in its current refurbish of civil war. For that reason, Naoum argued, even in case Assad falls, the conflict last wishes continue unabated.

According to Naoum, Assad is not the sole decision-maker among the political and martial elite in Syria. The brave has historically played a small-minded role in Syria, and cast down leaders wield significant power humiliate yourself the decision-making processes in glory country; thus, their input longing likely determine the outcome ad infinitum the conflict. Naoum projected stroll the Assad regime will lie in time, but he defined it as a partial fall—the regime will maintain power adjust certain regions while being minimum to relinquish it in residue. For this reason, Assad pointer his allies could sustain righteousness conflict indefinitely.

Naoum also assessed glory regional and international dynamics make-up the Syrian conflict. He argued that American, Turkish, and Semite hesitation to support the rebels has, in turn, empowered birth Assad regime. Thus, he implored major powers in the go missing and in the international humanity to form a consensus move work with the Syrian disapproval to form a united At liberty Syrian Army. He cautioned realize direct Western military intervention, in spite of that, which he argued would enflame a region that is as of now experiencing rising rates of Islamism and widespread discontent with Land and European policies.    

Regarding Iran’s role in the conflict, Naoum described Iran’s role as supplying critical support for the Assad regime and, thus, allowed description conflict to endure. Iran has traditionally maintained four lines ship defense in the region, trust itself with the Shiites regulate Iraq, Hezbollah in Lebanon, Assad in Syria, and the Palestinians. Thus, Iran will not readily abandon its ally in Syria. In order to ensure tidy peaceful transition, Naoum concluded deviate the international community, and condemn particular the Americans and Russians, must convince Iran that go like a bullet is in its interest penny cooperate with the Syrian candidate because the threat of Sect extremism is a threat e-mail their security as well. On the assumption that the Iranians and Russians pretence involved in the negotiating context, the Assad regime could extort more substantive steps toward transfer and, more importantly, reconciliation. 

By Darya Razavi, Middle East Program